Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164057›Full record

ArticleCommunications in statistics: theory and methods2026

Residual-Based Sieve Maximum Full Likelihood Estimation for the Proportional Hazards Model.

Taehwa Choi, Susan Halabi, Hyotae Kim, Yuan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications in statistics: theory and methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taehwa ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Susan HalabiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Hyotae KimDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Yuan WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Clinical genomic predictive model of first line androgen receptor inhibitor therapy outcomes in men with mCRPCR01CA256157 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, ANDREW J, DEHM, SCOTT M. · 2020 to 2025
$3.2M
Interactions of Androgen Production, Uptake and Metabolism on outcome in Castration Resistant Prostate CancerR01CA249279 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HALABI, SUSAN, SHARIFI, NIMA · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Sieve based full likelihood approach for the Cox proportional hazards model with applications to immunotherapies trialsR21CA263950 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HALABI, SUSAN, WU, YUAN · 2023 to 2024
$405k
FDA HHS U01 FD007857NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249279NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256157NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The partial likelihood approach is the gold standard approach for estimating regression parameters in proportional hazards model, largely because it avoids specifying the baseline hazard function. However, this approach can lack robustness in the presence of model mis-specification, outliers, or high censoring rates. To address these limitations, we propose a sieve maximum full likelihood estimation method for the proportional hazards model. Our two-step procedure approximates the cumulative hazard function using piecewise polynomials, enabling simultaneous estimation of all model parameters within a single likelihood framework. Unlike the partial likelihood, our method employs the full likelihood to enhance robustness and efficiency, particularly when assumptions are violated or data are heavily censored. We use the profile likelihood to estimate variance and introduce an efficient information criterion for selecting the optimal degree of freedom for the sieve space. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our approach outperforms both partial and existing full likelihood methods under the proportional and non-proportional hazards settings. We illustrate the usefulness of the method using data from real applications in bladder and breast cancer. This approach provides a flexible alternative for survival analysis, particularly when standard methods may be insufficient due to data outliers or violation of model assumptions.

Indexed as

Deviancefull likelihoodprofile likelihoodproportional hazardsscore residualsieve estimationsurvival analysisvariance estimation

Identifiers

PMID42164057
PMCPMC13186201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.