Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164035›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2026

A standardised and reproducible method for

Dylan R Barnett, Rohan Bhattacharjya, Jake Bastian, Akshay Kanhere, David Daniel, Shantanu Bhattacharjya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dylan R BarnettFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4270-3786
Rohan BhattacharjyaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1032-0935
Jake BastianFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9746-7720
Akshay KanhereFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2153-9878
David DanielFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0056-415X
Shantanu BhattacharjyaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-3727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapidly changing landscape of abdominal transplantation including regional normothermic perfusion of abdominal organs during procurement, broadening indications for multi-visceral transplantation (MVT) in both benign and malignant pathology and the ever increasing gap between organ supply and demand have necessitated the normalisation of expanded criteria donors (ECD). Key to mitigating the increased risk of delayed or non-function of ECD organs is the development of suitable preclinical animal models that allow for the development of reliable viability assessment as well as reconditioning and repair protocols that can thereafter be translated to humans. Due to physiological and anatomical similarities to humans, pigs make ideal pre-clinical animal models. Our group has recently concluded a study assessing the feasibility of machine perfusion and reanimation in a porcine model. In this paper, the authors describe a reproducible Methods: Twenty-six adult female Large White pigs ( Results: We describe the stepwise surgical technique of multi-organ retrieval as a combined organ block. The average procedure time was 108.3 (range, 57-179) min. Conclusions: This surgical technique facilitated retrieval of all twenty-six organ blocks for experiments in MVT. The warm ischemia duration is minimal and closely replicates donation following brain death (DBD) in humans. With minor modifications, a donation following circulatory death (DCD) model would also be achievable. This technique is reproducible and safe and can be used to retrieve abdominal organs collectively for

Indexed as

animalmodelsorgan transplantationswineTissue and organ procurement

Identifiers

PMID42164035
PMCPMC13184405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.