ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2026
A standardised and reproducible method for
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapidly changing landscape of abdominal transplantation including regional normothermic perfusion of abdominal organs during procurement, broadening indications for multi-visceral transplantation (MVT) in both benign and malignant pathology and the ever increasing gap between organ supply and demand have necessitated the normalisation of expanded criteria donors (ECD). Key to mitigating the increased risk of delayed or non-function of ECD organs is the development of suitable preclinical animal models that allow for the development of reliable viability assessment as well as reconditioning and repair protocols that can thereafter be translated to humans. Due to physiological and anatomical similarities to humans, pigs make ideal pre-clinical animal models. Our group has recently concluded a study assessing the feasibility of machine perfusion and reanimation in a porcine model. In this paper, the authors describe a reproducible Methods: Twenty-six adult female Large White pigs ( Results: We describe the stepwise surgical technique of multi-organ retrieval as a combined organ block. The average procedure time was 108.3 (range, 57-179) min. Conclusions: This surgical technique facilitated retrieval of all twenty-six organ blocks for experiments in MVT. The warm ischemia duration is minimal and closely replicates donation following brain death (DBD) in humans. With minor modifications, a donation following circulatory death (DCD) model would also be achievable. This technique is reproducible and safe and can be used to retrieve abdominal organs collectively for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.