Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164019›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

U.S. policy research funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, 1993-2024.

Briana S Last, Nicole Teow, Madeline Poupard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Briana S LastDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5473-1357
Nicole TeowDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7954-3150
Madeline PoupardDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9072-6119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to identify the share of National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funding allocated to U.S. policy research over the past 3 decades (1993-2024). Methods: We systematically searched the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results database using keywords. Manually reviewing the titles, abstracts, and publications of all projects identified through this search, we categorized a project as U.S. policy research if it studied the outcome(s) and/or implementation of a policy and if it had a mental health focus. We measured the share of NIMH projects and funding allocated to policy research as a percentage of all NIMH projects and funding between 1993 and 2024. We also examined whether NIMH projects and funding for policy research changed between 1993 and 2024. Results: Aggregating all NIMH funding between 1993 and 2024, NIMH funded 110 969 projects and allocated $39.34 billion to research, of which 1510 projects (1.36%) and $800.59 million (2.04%) were policy research. NIMH funded 29 policy projects ($16.27 million) in 1993 and 62 policy projects ($33.69 million) in 2024, a 113.79% increase in policy projects. Conclusion: NIMH allocates a small share of research dollars and projects to U.S. policy research despite policies' importance to population mental health.

Indexed as

federal fundingmental healthpolicy research

Identifiers

PMID42164019
PMCPMC13186268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.