ReviewCureus2026
Symptom-Level Precision Neurology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): Linking Microglial Pruning, Mitochondrial Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+) Compensation, and Autophagy Failure Across the Aging Spectrum.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heterogeneous neurological disease with limited disease-modifying treatment options and, for many patients, a short survival window. The clinical course varies widely. Limb weakness, bulbar impairment, respiratory decline, fine-motor dysfunction, cognitive change, mood symptoms, and fatigue may each appear at different times and progress at different rates. This variability suggests that motor neuron loss alone may not fully explain the patient-level pattern of symptoms. This article is a narrative hypothesis framework, not a clinical guideline or a validated stratification tool. Established ALS biology, associative genomic findings, preclinical observations, computational predictions, and author-derived hypotheses are therefore separated throughout the article. This review brings together four interlinked studies by the current author as a primary hypothesis-generating corpus, which proposes that synaptic plasticity fragility may initiate a microglial pruning continuum shared by major depressive disorder and ALS, while ALS-specific progression may depend on mitochondrial stress, oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) compensation failure, and collapse of autophagy under aging-related limits. The model presented here maps symptom domains to vulnerable circuit compartments and separates three broad biological states: compensated plasticity, fragile plasticity, and network collapse. A compact mechanistic formulation is used to describe the balance between pruning pressure, glutamatergic burden, and aging stress on one side, and oxidative phosphorylation capacity, NAD+ reserve, and autophagic clearance on the other. The framework also incorporates opposing phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1α) pathway patterns that may distinguish ALS from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) within an aging context. The result is a falsifiable, biomarker-oriented hypothesis model for future studies, not an evidence-based diagnostic or therapeutic algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.