ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026
Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in 16,680 patients evaluated by cardiac computed tomography.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is a congenital cardiac anomaly in which a coronary artery arises from an abnormal location on the aorta. In this article, we refer to the classification by Cheezum Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 16,680 electrocardiography-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans from years 2015-2022. Anomalies were found in 102 patients. Inclusion criteria were: scan description allowing for identification of coronary anomalies or images available, and patient age over 18 years. This resulted in a sample of 96 patients with anomalies. Results: The study group consisted of 42 women and 54 men; median age at the time of diagnosis was 61 years. The most common anomalies were: right anomalous origin of the left circumflex artery (R-LCx) (48 cases - 50%), right coronary artery from the left sinus (17 cases - 18%), left main coronary artery from the right sinus (7 cases - 7%), and left anterior descending artery from the right sinus (12 cases - 13%). The courses were as follows: retroaortic (47 cases - 48%), interarterial (27 cases - 29%), retrocardiac (2 cases - 2%), and prepulmonic (2 cases - 2%). Conclusions: AAOCAs were found in 0.58% of CT scans performed. R-LCx was the most prevalent type, and the most prevalent course was retroaortic (47). Anomalies were mostly benign in their clinical manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.