ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026
Differentiation of cervical cancer subtypes using machine learning models on MRI images.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and compare various radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models for distinguishing cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from non-SCC histopathological subtypes, using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 88 women (mean age, 51.1 ±13.0 years; range, 25-83 years) with histopathologically confirmed cervical cancer (47 SCC, 41 non-SCC). For each patient, axial and sagittal T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were available, along with clinical metadata. Radiomic features (shape, first-order, and texture features including gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level run length matrix, and gray-level size zone matrix) were extracted from each sequence, yielding 945 features per patient. A feature set was created by combining features from all three sequences. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used for feature selection. Three supervised classifiers - random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) - were trained to classify SCC versus non-SCC. Results: Among the single-sequence models, the sagittal T2WI sequence demonstrated the strongest performance, achieving receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.839 with SVM and 0.732 with LR. In contrast, the axial T2WI RF model showed poor discriminative ability (ROC-AUC: 0.464), indicating that this sequence alone provides limited value for subtype differentiation despite showing acceptable accuracy metrics. The combined multi-sequence model yielded the highest overall performance. Using LASSO-selected features, RF achieved the best ROC-AUC (0.958), followed closely by SVM (0.953) and LR (0.951), with all models attaining accuracies above 0.91. Conclusions: Feature-level integration of axial T2WI, sagittal T2WI, and DWI substantially enhances ML performance in differentiating SCC from non-SCC cervical cancer subtypes. Compared with single-sequence models, the combined multi-sequence approach provides more robust and well-balanced classification, underscoring the complementary value of multiparametric MRI for histopathological subtype prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.