Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based risk prediction model for obesity in Chinese children and adolescents: a population-based study.

Zekai Chen, Lin Zhu, Peijie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zekai ChenSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Lin ZhuSchool of Sport and Health, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Peijie ChenSchool of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity represents a significant global public health challenge. Accurate and rapid prediction models for identifying obesity risk in children and adolescents are essential for facilitating early prevention and enabling timely interventions. However, interpretable and user-friendly obesity risk prediction models based on nationally representative data remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a model to predict current obesity risk among children and adolescents in China. Methods: The models were developed using cross-sectional data from the 2017-2018 Physical Activity and Fitness in China-The Youth Study (PAFCTYS; Results: The random forest (RF) model outperformed all other models, achieving an AUC of 1.000 on the training set and 0.946 on the testing set. It also maintained good discriminative performance on the temporal validation dataset, with an AUC of 0.810. The RF model also shows the highest accuracy, specificity, and MCC, and the lowest Brier score. SHAP analysis indicates that parental BMI, using mobile electronic devices on weekdays, MVPA (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), watching TV on weekdays, and sex are the top 5 most important features in the obesity risk prediction model. A web-based risk calculator based on the RF model has been successfully deployed. Conclusion: Using a large, nationally representative sample and readily available variables, we successfully developed and validated an obesity risk prediction model for Chinese children and adolescents using explainable machine learning techniques. The model can quickly and accurately assess an individual's current obesity risk, enabling healthcare agencies, schools, and parents to conduct large-scale obesity risk screening.

Indexed as

children and adolescentsmachine learningobesityprediction modelSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42163956
PMCPMC13183532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.