ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Large language models and child mortality: opportunities and challenges in answering public queries on under-5 causes.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reducing under-5 mortality remains a global health priority. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by the public to access medical information. However, current evidence evaluating LLMs' performance in public-facing child health communication is scarce. Methods: We selected the top five search terms related to each of the five leading causes of under-5 mortality (prematurity, pneumonia, birth asphyxia, malaria, and diarrhoea) using Google Trends, generating 25 representative public queries. Responses were collected from four LLMs (ChatGPT-4.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Bing AI, and Gemini) and independently evaluated by four pediatricians. We used the DISCERN instrument for information reliability; 5-point Likert scales for accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility; Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) indices for readability; and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) for understandability and actionability. Differences among models were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests, with statistical significance set at Results: We found significant performance variations among the four models across most evaluation metrics. Bing AI achieved the highest total DISCERN score (median 42) and the highest reliability subscore (Section A median 28). Claude consistently underperformed across multiple domains. Notably, readability was poor for all models, with high language complexity (mean FKGL score 12.4). Critically, actionability scores were near zero for all models on the PEMAT-P scale, reflecting a universal lack of clear and practical behavioral guidance. Conclusion: While LLMs can generally provide accurate health information, limitations in readability and actionability restrict their practical application in public health communication. Future development should prioritize language simplification and clearer behavioral guidance to enhance their value in public-facing child health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.