ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2026
Protective effects of cilostazol against cisplatin-induced hepatorenal toxicity in male mice.
Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Cisplatin (CPN) is a widely used and potent chemotherapy drug for cancer treatment. However, one of the major side effects of CPN is hepatorenal toxicity. Recently, cilostazol (CSZ), a type III phosphodiesterase inhibitor, has promising effects against liver and kidney toxicities. We assessed the effects of CSZ against CPN-induced hepatorenal toxicity (CIHR) in male mice. Experimental approach: Twenty-four male mice were randomly assigned as follows: control group (no treatment), CPN group (treated with 20 mg/kg CPN on day one of the experiment), and CPN + CSZ 3 and 15 groups (treated with CPN on day one of the experiment plus CSZ (3 and 15 mg/kg) orally for four days). Biochemical, oxidative, and histological investigations were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of CSZ in protecting the liver and kidneys from CPN-induced damage. Findings/Results: The results showed that treatment with CSZ, especially at 15 mg/kg, significantly reduced the CPN-induced increase in serum concentrations of biochemical markers such as alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine. Furthermore, CSZ treatment at 15 mg/kg also restored the hepatorenal oxidative stress factors, including superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde, and glutathione peroxidase. Histological examination revealed a significant improvement in groups receiving CSZ (15 mg/kg) compared to the CPN-treated group, alongside biochemical and oxidative results. Conclusion and implications: The findings of this investigation point towards the potential of CSZ as a viable contender for subsequent exploration in the realm of devising efficacious therapeutic approaches for CIHR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.