ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Development and internal-external validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative 30-day malnutrition risk in cervical cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition at 30 days after surgery is common in cervical cancer patients and may adversely affect long-term outcomes. This retrospective study developed and validated an interpretable predictive nomogram for early identification of postoperative malnutrition (NRS-2002 ≥3) in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer undergoing radical surgery. A total of 784 patients were included and divided into a training cohort (n=431), an internal validation cohort (n=180), and an independent external cohort (n=173). Clinical, sociodemographic, treatment-related, and laboratory variables were collected, and predictors were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration analysis, decision curve analysis, and DeLong testing against albumin (ALB) alone. The final model incorporated eight independent predictors: age, body mass index (BMI), marital status, presence of a caregiver, parenteral nutrition support, lymph node metastasis, FIGO stage, and ALB. The nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.756, 0.742, and 0.807 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively, with Brier scores ranging from 0.1859 to 0.2143, and showed stable net benefit across a wide threshold probability range (0.04-0.99). In the pooled sample, the nomogram significantly outperformed ALB alone (P<0.001). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis enhanced interpretability and identified ALB, age, and lymph node metastasis as the most influential features driving predictions. Among 725 patients (92.5%) with follow-up data, 77 deaths (10.6%) occurred, and survival analyses demonstrated that unmarried status (HR=2.21), lymph node metastasis (HR=4.74), higher FIGO stage (HR=5.15), poor differentiation (HR=2.12), and higher risk scores (HR=1.88) were independently associated with worse overall survival, whereas human papillomavirus positivity was protective (HR=0.63). These findings suggest that the proposed nomogram provides accurate and explainable prediction of postoperative malnutrition and may support early risk stratification as well as long-term prognostic assessment in cervical cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.