ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Deep-learning-based radiomics of intratumoral and peritumoral CT images to differentiate benign from malignant parotid tumors.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the value of radiomics and deep learning features derived from intratumoral and peritumoral regions based on CT images in distinguishing benign from malignant parotid gland tumors (PGTs), and to evaluate whether integrating clinical, radiomics, and deep learning features could improve differential diagnostic efficiency. We retrospectively collected CT imaging and clinical data from 357 patients with confirmed parotid gland tumors (PGTs) after surgery. The dataset was randomly divided into two sets at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was applied for feature selection. Traditional radiomics (RAD), deep learning (DL), and fusion (RAD+DL) models were constructed using logistic regression (LR). A combined predictive model was further developed by integrating the optimal model with clinical and CT features. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The fusion model (Tumor+External2_RAD+DL) incorporating both radiomics and deep learning features from intratumoral and peritumoral regions achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.881 (95% CI: 0.809-0.943) in the test set. After integrating clinical features (including symptoms, margin, and enlarged lymph nodes), the combined model showed the highest predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.913 (95% CI: 0.842-0.966) and an accuracy of 0.880, significantly outperforming the clinical model alone and models using only intratumoral or peritumoral features from a single region. In conclusion, the fusion model integrating radiomics and deep learning features from intratumoral and peritumoral regions on CT images effectively distinguishes benign from malignant PGTs. The combined model incorporating clinical factors achieves superior predictive performance, demonstrating good potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.