ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Conversion-intent definitive liver-directed therapy improves survival in liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic therapy provides substantial disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet liver metastases often determine prognosis; real-world evidence for using conversion-intent definitive liver-directed therapy (DLDT) as consolidation after first-line treatment remains limited. We retrospectively analyzed 172 patients with initially unresectable, liver-predominant mCRC treated with first-line systemic therapy at National Taiwan University Hospital (2017-2023), comparing those who underwent conversion-intent DLDT during first-line treatment (n=100) with those who continued systemic therapy alone (n=72). Primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Conversion-intent DLDT markedly prolonged TTF (29.7 vs. 7.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.16, P<0.001) and OS (47.0 vs. 17.7 months; HR 0.20, P<0.001). At 24 months, 49.6% of DLDT recipients remained on first-line therapy and 57.2% were alive, compared with 9.3% and 17.9% in controls. Outcomes were comparable between resection-based and ablation-only approaches. In multivariable models, conversion-intent DLDT remained independently associated with improved TTF (HR 0.16) and OS (HR 0.20), with similar associations observed across major molecular alterations. These findings support a multidisciplinary strategy incorporating conversion-intent DLDT after first-line systemic therapy for liver-predominant mCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.