ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Emerging Insights of Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer.
Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer -associated thrombosis (CAT), particularly venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a major contributor to mortality in cancer patients and is widely recognized as a leading cause of death after the direct effects of cancer progression. Cancer patients have significantly higher VTE risk than the general population, due to hypercoagulable states and anticancer therapies, with those with advanced malignancies carrying the highest risk. Primary thromboprophylaxis and anticoagulation are pivotal for CAT management. Despite advances, key challenges include different thrombotic and bleeding risks across cancers and how recurrent VTE affects anticoagulation duration. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has largely replaced warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are challenging LMWH's first-line role with proven efficacy. However, the key dilemma is balancing thromboprophylaxis and treatment against anticoagulant-induced bleeding, particularly in the context of recurrent VTE. Current CAT guidelines show discrepancies and gaps in clinical coverage; some conclusions derived from meta-analyses need validation via more randomized controlled trials. This review synthesizes recent CAT research (focused on VTE) across epidemiology, pathophysiology, laboratory assessments, and management. It analyzes how cancer type, patient conditions, and drug-drug interactions influence anticoagulant selection, supported by a review of the corresponding experimental evidence. Additionally, the article addresses key clinical scenarios (e.g., intracerebral hemorrhage, pregnancy, pediatric and adolescent patients, and COVID-19) to aid clinical decision-making, delineates unresolved clinical controversies, and integrates high-quality cohort/subgroup data to guide meta-analysis validation. By summarizing risk-benefit consideration, this article provides a framework for complex cases and informs future RCT design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.