ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2026
The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Ankle Fractures.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkle fractures are among the most common types of fracture among adults in Germany, with an incidence of 74 ± 32 cases per 100 000 persons per year. Treatment strategies have changed considerably over the past decade. In this review, we present the current treatment strategies for ankle fractures, aftercare, and long-term results.
methodsCurrent treatment strategies for ankle fractures were summarized in the framework of a narrative review and expert consensus of the German Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (
resultsStable, non- or minimally displaced unimalleolar fractures (AO 44A and 44B) can be treated non-operatively with an early return to function. Stability should be verified by bilateral, weight-bearing radiography. Fractures that are unstable or displaced should be treated surgically. Active individuals seem to benefit from anatomic reduction and the stabilization of all fractures and unstable syndesmotic injuries (360° treatment). Minimally invasive techniques are recommended in case of critical soft-tissue conditions or major comorbidity. The benefit of the currently prevailing restrictive postoperative regimens (six weeks of immobilization and reduced or no weight-bearing) has been called into question by the findings of a large number of randomized controlled trials. Early weight-bearing and mobilization improve early functional outcomes without increasing complication rates. Long-term studies have shown that a moderate to poor functional outcome can be expected in up to 20% of cases ≥ 10 years after the operative treatment of an ankle fracture.
conclusionTreatment strategies and aftercare regimens have evolved over the past decade. Future studies will need to determine whether these new strategies yield better long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.