ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2026
"Bioprinting of Hair: How Far We Proceeded and What Needs to be Done".
Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia is a common dermatologic disorder with psychological and quality-of-life impact. Current options such as PRP, topical agents, microneedling or dermarollers, drugs, and transplantation, often provide only partial or short-term benefit and depend on existing follicles. 3D bioprinting is transforming regenerative trichology by positioning cells and "bioinks" to recreate hair-bearing skin. Advances include biomimetic dermal papilla spheroids, follicle organoids in engineered dermis, and bioprinted skin equivalents with nascent HF-like structures. Translation is limited by vascular and nerve integration and hair-cycle control. These priorities will enable robust clinical regeneration. This review recapitulates the recent advances at the interface of hair-follicle biology and 3D bioprinting, and delineates key bioengineering and cellular components underpinning folliculogenesis. Recent advancements have enabled the fabrication of biomimetic dermal papilla spheroids, the spatial integration of hair-follicle organoids within engineered dermal matrices, and the fabrication of bioprinted skin equivalents containing nascent HF-like structures, representing functional relevance for pharmacological evaluation and regenerative transplantation studies. Clinical translation of hair bioprinting remains impeded by the integration of functional vascular and neural networks, and recapitulating hair-cycle dynamics. This review outlines strategic priorities required to move the field from experimental proof of concept to scalable, clinically relevant hair regeneration using bio-prinking technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.