ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026
Glucose metabolic reprogramming as a driver of immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment.
Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic licensing and restriction of innate immunity in the tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative approach to cancer treatment, yet its clinical efficacy in most solid tumours remains limited, largely because of the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME). In this context, glucose metabolic reprogramming has emerged as a central determinant of tumour progression and immune dysfunction because it not only sustains the proliferative and biosynthetic demands of malignant cells but also profoundly reshapes immune responses within the TME. Effective antitumour immunity depends on the metabolic adaptability of effector immune cells, particularly the coordinated use of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to support activation, expansion and cytotoxic function. Under the nutrient-deprived, hypoxic and acidic conditions that characterize the TME, however, these cells undergo metabolic restriction that progressively drives dysfunction and exhaustion. By contrast, regulatory T cells, tumour-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells exhibit greater metabolic plasticity, enabling their persistence and reinforcing their immunosuppressive activity. In this review, we discuss how glucose metabolic reprogramming drives immune dysfunction through several interconnected processes, including glucose competition, lactate accumulation, reciprocal regulation between glucose metabolism and cytokine signalling, glycosylation remodelling and dynamic crosstalk with immune checkpoint signalling. Collectively, these mechanisms position glucose metabolism as a pivotal immunometabolic axis linking tumour bioenergetics to immune evasion and therapeutic resistance. A deeper understanding of this regulatory network may inform the rational development of combination strategies that integrate metabolic intervention with immunotherapy, ultimately improving therapeutic precision and the durability of clinical benefit. HIGHLIGHT: Glucose metabolic reprogramming is a central driver of immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment. Glucose competition establishes a selective bioenergetic hierarchy that constrains antitumour immunity. Lactate accumulation and reciprocal regulation with cytokine signalling amplify immunosuppressive signalling and reinforce immune exclusion. Glycosylation remodelling translates altered metabolic flux into sustained changes in receptor stability, ligand recognition and checkpoint responsiveness. Dynamic crosstalk with immune checkpoint signalling entrenches chronic immune dysfunction and therapeutic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.