ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Optimal Neoadjuvant Approach for Resectable Esophageal Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for patients with resectable esophageal cancer (EC), yet the optimal therapeutic approach remains unclear. We performed an updated network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of current neoadjuvant immunotherapy-based strategies using the most recent prospective randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies published before August 1, 2025 were systematically identified, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods was conducted. The primary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (mPR), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs), and survival outcomes. A total of 41 trials involving 4624 patients were included. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (nICRT+S) achieved the highest pCR rate and demonstrated superior efficacy compared with other neoadjuvant approaches. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT+S) showed the greatest probability of ranking first in improving mPR and ORR. Importantly, the addition of immunotherapy or radiotherapy did not increase the incidence of grade ≥ 3 tr-AEs, and maintenance immunotherapy after surgery did not confer additional survival benefit based on the currently available evidence with limited follow-up. Overall, these findings indicate that nI(C)RT+S may represent the most effective neoadjuvant strategy for patients with resectable EC, offering improved tumor response without increasing treatment-related toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.