ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Breast Cancer Outcomes From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Evidence of the Associations between specific Benign Breast Diagnoses and Future Breast Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This population-based cohort study investigated whether the subsequent risk of breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has changed over time in New Zealand women diagnosed between 2000 and 2022, using data from the New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation National Register. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast event, including invasive cancer (iIBC) or DCIS (iDCIS). Fine-Gray subdistributional hazard models assessed associations with demographic and clinical factors, and a 5-year landmark analysis evaluated subsequent risk among women who remained event-free at 5 years. Among 5830 patients (median follow-up 4.8 years), the overall 5-year cumulative risk of iIBC was 3.3% (95% CI: 2.7%, 3.9%). In the 5-year landmark cohort, the subsequent 5-year risk was 4.1% (3.3%, 5.0%). Corresponding iDCIS rates were 2.5% (2.0%, 3.0%) and 1.7% (1.2%, 2.3%), respectively. Age < 45 years at diagnosis and DCIS size > 20 mm were associated with a higher iIBC risk, but the association with younger age attenuated in the landmark analysis. Compared with breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone, both radiotherapy following BCS and mastectomy were associated with a lower iIBC risk; however, the association for radiotherapy was not evident at the 5-year landmark. Overall, women with DCIS had a 5.25-fold higher risk of invasive breast cancer than the general population (95% CI: 4.79, 5.73). Our findings support the importance of long-term mammographic surveillance, particularly for women with larger DCIS, those treated with BCS, and possibly younger women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.