ArticleHIV research & clinical practice2026
Perceptions of young people living with HIV and caregivers in Botswana on analytical treatment interruption studies: a qualitative approach.
Article in HIV research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent research suggests that post-treatment HIV control may be possible for some people following antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruption. Although closely monitored analytic treatment interruption (ATI) studies can be performed safely and are crucial to determine who may no longer require ART, currently it is unknown how acceptable these studies will be in Botswana.
aimTo determine the knowledge, attitudes and acceptability of ATI-inclusive studies in Botswana.
methodsWe employed a non-randomized purposive design to recruit study participants. We conducted face-to-face open-ended interviews with 12 young people living with HIV and 8 caregivers, 8 healthcare providers and 4 community advocates in Gaborone and Palapye.
resultsThirty-two (32) participants consented to be interviewed. The median age of young people living with HIV was 29 years. All young people living with HIV indicated that they were on ART and acknowledged the benefits of being on ART. All young people living with HIV were unaware of ATIs, whereas 6 out of 8 caregivers, 6 out of 8 healthcare providers and 2 out of 4 community advocates had never heard of ATIs. Most participants found ATI research to be acceptable and believed that it would be beneficial provided there were adequate risk mitigations in place.
conclusionsATI studies were acceptable to both young people living with HIV and their caregivers. There was limited knowledge about ATI, highlighting a need to inform communities and health care providers on the scientific aspects of ATI and HIV cure research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.