ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
A clinically feasible framework to estimate tau pathology and clinical-biological discordance in the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTau positron emission tomography (PET) is critical for biological staging and treatment stratification in Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly in the era of anti-amyloid therapies where lower tau burden predicts greater clinical benefit. However, tau PET remains costly and inaccessible in many clinical settings. We aimed to develop and validate a clinically feasible framework to estimate global and regional tau burden using routinely available amyloid PET and clinical measures, aligned with the 2024 Alzheimer's Association (AA-2024) diagnostic framework, and to characterize clinical-biological discordance across the AD continuum.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 229 individuals spanning cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages who underwent [
resultsGlobal and regional tau burden increased stepwise across clinical severity and amyloid strata. High global tau burden was uncommon in individuals with CL 21-60 (6.1%) but increased in CL 61-100 (22.6%) and > 100 (36.2%). A multivariable model integrating CL, age, MMSE, and relative MTL volume demonstrated good discrimination for high global tau burden (AUC = 0.87) and neocortical involvement (AUC = 0.84). Model robustness was confirmed by bootstrap resampling. Among amyloid-positive participants, 53.1% exhibited clinical-predominant AD, characterized by older age and higher cardiovascular risk despite relatively modest tau burden, indicating substantial clinical-biological discordance.
conclusionRoutinely obtainable amyloid PET and clinical measures can approximate global and topographical tau burden with good accuracy and identify frequent clinical-biological discordance within the AD spectrum. This scalable framework provides a practical surrogate for tau PET in resource-limited settings and may support biological staging, therapeutic eligibility assessment, and precision treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.