Observational studyJournal of translational medicine2026
Heat stroke management: clinical phenotypes and implications for cooling strategies.
Observational study in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05923931 (Non-inferiority Study of the Effect of Non-cooling Blanket on Body Temperature in Patients With Heat Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non-inferiority Study of the Effect of Non-cooling Blanket on Body Temperature in Patients With Heat Stroke
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeat stroke is a life-threatening condition demanding rapid core temperature reduction. However, optimizing cooling strategies is challenging due to pronounced patient heterogeneity. This study aimed to identify distinct clinical phenotypes of heat stroke to enable personalized cooling management.
methodsThis two-stage study analyzed heat stroke patients from seven tertiary hospitals in China. The prospective cohort was derived from an ongoing, prospectively registered clinical trial (NCT05923931). Latent class analysis was applied to this prospective cohort to derive a phenotype model, which was validated in an independent retrospective cohort and then applied to the total cohort (N = 298) for analysis. Phenotype-specific cooling responses were evaluated by testing interactions between phenotype and cooling modalities and by comparing the effectiveness of practical cooling bundles within each phenotype. Associations between early infusion volume and 48-hour biomarker trajectories were explored using generalized additive mixed models.
resultsThe analysis identified two distinct clinical phenotypes: a non-severe phenotype (47%) and a severe phenotype (53%). The severe phenotype was characterized by more profound organ injury, a slower cooling rate, and higher mortality. Crucially, the efficacy of core cooling modalities was phenotype-specific (P for interaction = 0.038): evaporation cooling was highly effective in the non-severe phenotype but had attenuated effect in the severe phenotype. For the severe phenotype, a bundled strategy of high-volume cold-fluid infusion combined with evaporation cooling was necessary to achieve the fastest cooling (β = 0.03, p < 0.001), whereas either modality alone was insufficient. Exploratory analysis further revealed that early infusion volume was differentially associated with subsequent changes in organ stress biomarkers between the two phenotypes. The direction of all key associations was consistent across cohorts, and the primary phenotype-specific response patterns were reproduced, confirming the robustness of the findings.
conclusionsThis study identifies a clinically actionable phenotype classification for heat stroke. Our findings suggest a phenotype-guided management protocol: for non-severe cases, prioritize evaporation cooling with conservative fluids; for severe cases, a bundled strategy of high-volume cold-fluid infusion plus evaporation is necessary. This hypothesis-generating framework offers a potential pathway toward early, tailored intervention at the point of care, pending confirmation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.