ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026
The UQTR university-based chiropractic clinic cohort (UQTRChiCo): description and summary of an available data source for research collaborations.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders are the leading cause of disability in Canada, and chiropractic care is among the most commonly used healthcare services for their management. Despite this, little is known about the quality of care and adherence to clinical practice guidelines in chiropractic educational settings. This study aimed to describe the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières university-based chiropractic clinic cohort (UQTRChiCo) and summarize its patient characteristics, care provided, and available outcome data.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who first consulted at the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR) chiropractic clinic in 2017, with longitudinal follow-up through 2019. Reasons for clinical consultation (i.e., specific chief complaints) were treated as separate observations. Data were extracted from clinical records and included patient demographics, clinical presentations, care provided, and outcomes measured using validated questionnaires. Follow-up assessments were obtained from re-evaluations conducted at multiple time points between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019.
resultsThe UQTRChiCo comprises 2,148 distinct reasons for consultation from 1,305 unique patients (59% female, mean age 31 ± 18 years). The most common presentations were lumbar spine (28%), cervical spine (18%), and thoracic spine complaints (10%). Multiple concurrent complaints were reported in 44% of patients, and 43% of conditions were chronic. Care commonly included spinal manipulative therapy (88%) and soft tissue treatments (93%). Patient education and exercise prescription were documented in 67% and 48% of consultations, respectively. Diagnostic imaging was performed in 19% of consultations. Follow-up outcome documentation was available for 58% of consultations at the first re-evaluation, decreasing to 16% by the third re-evaluation.
conclusionThe UQTRChiCo provides a comprehensive description of an academic chiropractic clinical population primarily seeking care for spinal musculoskeletal complaints. Care delivery reflected a multimodal approach with restrained use of diagnostic imaging. While short-term outcome monitoring proved feasible, substantial attrition over time underscores a key challenge for longitudinal practice-based research in educational clinics. The UQTRChiCo represents a valuable resource for advancing research on care quality, guideline adherence, and patient outcomes in chiropractic training environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.