Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163356›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026

Effect of parent-focused interventions for screen use on developmental outcomes in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amanda Machell, Carrie Ewin, Sharon Horwood, Katherine L Downing, Kylie D Hesketh

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda MachellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. a.machell@deakin.edu.au.
Carrie EwinSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Sharon HorwoodSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Katherine L DowningInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kylie D HeskethInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

National Heart Foundation of Australia 105929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParents are a key target for interventions promoting healthy screen use in young children, but no review has evaluated the effect of such parent-focused interventions on developmental outcomes in early childhood. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of the effects of parent-focused interventions for screen use on young children's social-emotional, cognitive, and physical development, as well as proximal indicators of development including sleep and physical activity. A secondary objective was to assess their impact on children's screen use.

methodsEight databases were searched with publication dates between 2007 and March 2025. Randomised controlled trials of parent-focused interventions targeting screen use in children (birth-5.99 years) were included if they reported outcomes related to both child screen use and development. Stata was used to undertake meta-analyses using multilevel random effects models to estimate effects for outcomes with data from at least three papers.

resultsIn total, 10 studies (11 papers) were eligible for inclusion, with eight studies (n = 1,776 participants) providing sufficient data to be included in meta-analyses of at least one outcome. Interventions targeted screen use duration (n = 8 studies), screen use before bed (n = 1 study) and screen content (n = 1 study; 2 papers). Interventions achieved reductions in social-emotional problems (ES=-0.32 (95%CI:-0.51,-0.12)), externalizing behaviors (ES=-0.31 (95%CI:-0.56,-0.05)) and screen time (ES=-0.92 (95%CI:-1.66,-0.18)). Few interventions (n = 2) targeted aspects of screen use other than duration (e.g. content quality and timing). Larger effects were achieved for interventions that were underpinned by a theory and incorporated a range of established behavior change techniques, compared to interventions that did not incorporate these aspects. Few studies explored intervention effects on physical activity, body mass index, cognitive development and/or motor skills, and heterogenous sleep outcomes were reported, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding these outcomes.

conclusionsFew parent-focused interventions for screen use were identified and most targeted screen use duration. Future intervention studies may consider targeting aspects of screen use other than duration (e.g. content quality), and evaluating their feasibility and acceptability for parents, compared to interventions targeting screen use duration. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD420250654905).

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHealth PromotionParentsScreen TimeChild, PreschoolCognitionExerciseHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepCognitive developmentEarly childhoodPhysical development.Screen contextSocial-emotional development

Identifiers

PMID42163356
PMCPMC13374355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.