Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163329›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Navigating safety in practice: a qualitative study of how health care personnel organize medication management in Norwegian home care services.

Thomas Asmelash Habtu, Aud Uhlen Obstfelder, Janne Myhre, Nina Beate Andfossen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas Asmelash HabtuDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), East NTNU, Center for Care Research, Teknologivegen 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway. thomas.habtu@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3033-3735
Aud Uhlen ObstfelderDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), East NTNU, Center for Care Research, Teknologivegen 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-6560
Janne MyhreDepartment of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Social and Health Science, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, INN University, Elverum Norway, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4341-9612
Nina Beate AndfossenDepartment of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), East NTNU, Center for Care Research, Teknologivegen 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-2629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication management for older adults receiving municipal home care services involves daily coordination between home care staff, general practitioners, pharmacies, and hospitals across frequent care transitions and regulatory requirements. Although regulations, guidelines, and safety approaches are intended to support safe medication practices, healthcare professionals (HCPs) in home care work under conditions marked by time pressure, limited resources, and frequently changing medication information. However, there is limited knowledge about how HCPs interpret and apply these regulatory frameworks in everyday home care practice. This study aims to explore how HCPs organize medication management to ensure patient safety in Norwegian home care services.

methodsA focused ethnographic design was employed in three purposively sampled Norwegian municipalities. Data were generated through 218 h of participant observation, informal interviews, photographs, and document collection involving 25 participants from various professional backgrounds. The data were analyzed via an iterative ethnographic method inspired by Roper and Shapira.

resultsThe findings revealed an overarching cultural orientation, "the here and now," along with two interconnected pattern categories: "performing resilience: making the day run" and "enacting system integration: chasing the right information." Medication management was organized through continual coordination, task prioritization, and repeated efforts to obtain and verify medication information. Although HCPs adhered to regulations and guidelines, written procedures were inconsistently referenced in daily work. Instead, medication safety relies on locally organized practices, shared understandings, and adaptation to immediate demands.

conclusionMedication safety in municipal home care is maintained through a continuous, interpretive process shaped by the practical realities of daily work. Regulations and guidelines function alongside locally organized coordination and information work rather than as linear instructions. Understanding medication management as it unfolds in the here and now provides insight into the gap between work-as-imagined and work-as-done. This study contributes to the analytical concept of "here and now" to explain how medication safety is enacted through real-time coordination and information work in municipal home care. These findings indicate that guidelines and digital systems require improvement to better support real-time coordination and information work, and safety interventions also need to address local sensemaking and cross-organizational communication.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHome Care ServicesMedication Therapy ManagementPatient SafetyAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleNorwayQualitative ResearchEthnographyHealthcareHome care servicesMedication managementNorwayPatient safetyProfessionalsQualitative researchRegulations and guidelines

Identifiers

PMID42163329
PMCPMC13359423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.