SynthesisBMC health services research2026
An interdisciplinary mixed-methods systematic review of multidimensional factors shaping the outpatient waiting experience.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is a central indicator of healthcare quality and a key outcome in outpatient care. The waiting room, as the first point of contact, strongly shapes patients' comfort, expectations, and perceptions of service quality. Yet most existing studies remain confined within single disciplinary domains rather than integrated relationships among them. This lack of cross-disciplinary synthesis limits theoretical understanding and practical guidance. A systematic review is therefore needed to develop a comprehensive framework for improving outpatient experiences and supporting evidence-based design.
methodsA mixed-methods systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify major research themes and determinants of patient satisfaction in outpatient waiting rooms. Literature was retrieved from Scopus (2010-2024) using a modified PICO framework adapted for environmental and experiential variables. Quantitative bibliometric mapping analyzed keyword co-occurrence and thematic evolution across three periods, complemented by qualitative coding and thematic synthesis to interpret mechanisms and integrate findings.
resultsThis review included 125 studies, 113 research articles and 12 reviews (9.6%), with most appearing in medical/clinical outlets (n = 71; 56.8%), alongside contributions from the social sciences, nursing, engineering, psychology, and management. Across 2010-2014, 2015-2019, and 2020-2024, thematic emphasis shifted from service-quality-focused work toward broader patient-experience and built-environment perspectives, reflecting increasing cross-disciplinary integration. Quantitative mapping and the qualitative synthesis consistently organized determinants into five dimensions: physical environment, healthcare service experience, patient characteristics, perceptual environment, and mediating pathways. These results collectively informed the development of an integrated conceptual framework that structures the field around these five dimensions and their dynamic interactions.
conclusionsThis review consolidates dispersed findings into a multidimensional framework explaining how environmental, psychological, and service-related factors interact to shape patient satisfaction. The proposed framework offers a comprehensive basis for future empirical work and provides practical guidance for the holistic design and management of outpatient environments across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.