Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163308›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026

Ultrasound vessel sizing before cannulation: a measurement-first approach for anesthesiologists.

Luis Alberto Rodriguez Linares, Sarah Cerillo Lopes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis Alberto Rodriguez LinaresDepartment of Anesthesiology, GRAACC/UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil. luisro0729@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-1841
Sarah Cerillo LopesDepartment of Anesthesiology of ABC Foundation School of Medicine (FMABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2938-7372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The catheter gauge and length are often chosen based on visual estimation. Ultrasound allows for the direct measurement of vessel diameter and depth, which may reduce failed attempts, particularly in patients with difficult access and pediatric patients. This narrative review evaluated trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines on ultrasound-guided vascular access in adults and children to derive practical sizing rules for venous and arterial cannulation in anesthesiology. Key recommendations include targeting a catheter-to-vein ratio (CVR) ≤ 0.45 for peripheral IVs and using long catheters for deeper veins (≥ 8-10 mm); limiting catheter size to ≤ 1/3 of the vessel's luminal area (outer diameter/inner diameter ratio ≤ 0.577) for arterial lines to prevent spasm. A pediatric reference table links typical radial artery diameters to appropriate 22-24G catheter choices. Selecting central venous catheters that occupy approximately ≤ 33% of the vein's diameter may be a reasonable strategy to minimize complications. Evidence from clinical trials supports US-guided peripheral IV and radial artery cannulation over landmark-based techniques. We propose a five-step workflow (scan, measure, select gauge/length, US-guided cannulation, and confirmation) to implement this measurement-first approach. In conclusion, an ultrasound measurement-first strategy aligns catheter selection with vessel dimensions, improving first-pass success and reducing complications in both adult and pediatric practices. The proposed sizing tables and algorithm are intended to serve as practical decision-support tools for bedside applications.

Indexed as

CatheterizationCentral venousPeripheralRadial arteryUltrasonographyVascular access devices

Identifiers

PMID42163308
PMCPMC13366828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.