ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026
Two decades of safe abortion policy evolution and reform in Nepal (2002-2025): progress, implementation, challenges, and opportunities.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNepal has made significant strides in reproductive rights, legalizing safe abortion services (SAS) in 2002, and recognizing them as fundamental rights in its 2015 constitution. Despite this, over half of abortions remain unsafe, with persistent disparities in access to and utilization of safe abortion services. This study examines the trajectory of Nepal's abortion policy evolution and reform process, and implementation status, and ongoing challenges and opportunities using the heuristic policy cycle framework to inform evidence-based strategies for equitable reproductive rights.
methodsA policy process and content analysis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach. To identify relevant policy documents and literature, we used search terms related to three concepts: abortion, law, and location (Nepal). We identified 25 peer-reviewed studies and 32 grey literature policy documents published in English or Nepali up to 30 June 2025, identified via PubMed, Embase, Medline Ovid, Google Scholar, and government sources. Quantitative data were extracted from government annual reports and national census data. Data analysis involved thematic coding of qualitative data across five policy stages (agenda setting, formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation) and descriptive analysis of quantitative service utilization and the sex ratio at birth (SRB) data.
resultsAgenda setting of the legalization of abortion in Nepal was driven by high maternal mortality ratio and advocacy aligning with global commitments. The 2002 legal reform legalized abortion up to 12 weeks on demand, with provision requiring spousal consent, and banned on sex-selective abortion. Implementation efforts focused on capacity building, service expansion-expanding SAS to 1,685 sites-and equitable distribution of services, delivering 1.6 million SAS over two decades. The proportion of medical abortion has increased from 50% to 73% of cases. However, 53% of pregnancies are unintended, with abortion often used as contraception. More than 50% of service providers are outside the formal system. There is inequitable access to SAS, and the SRB is skewed towards male, indicating ongoing sex-selective abortion.
conclusionsNepal's abortion policy journey represents remarkable progress in legal reforms and service expansion; however several contextual and systemic barriers such as low awareness, rural inequity, unregulated providers, sex selective abortion, and the repeated use of abortion as family planning undermine equitable access and reproductive rights. Key reforms include expanding second-trimester services, strengthening regulations, combating sex-selective abortion practices, enhancing access to family planning services, and implementing abortion related awareness campaigns to address gender discrimination, service information gaps, and unintended consequences of unsafe practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.