Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163304›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2026

Standard-of-care ciltacabtagene autoleucel in earlier versus later lines of therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a nationwide registry analysis.

Nico Gagelmann, Hermann Einsele, Sarah Flossdorf, Samih Smaili, Klaus Metzeler, Christoph Scheid, Lars Bullinger, Sandra Sauer, Marc Raab, Justus Duyster and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Nico GagelmannUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hermann EinseleUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sarah FlossdorfUniversitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Samih SmailiUniversitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Klaus MetzelerUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph ScheidUniversitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany.
Lars BullingerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sandra SauerUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc RaabUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Justus DuysterUniversitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans Christian ReinhardtUniversitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Raphael TeipelUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus a. d. TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Winfried AlsdorfUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia LengerkeUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang HerrUniversitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Natalie SchubUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Francis Ayuketang AyukUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian BassermannTUM Universitätsklinikum, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Christian Schultze-FloreyHämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Germany.
Roland SchroersKnappschaft Kliniken Universitätsklinikum Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Mathias HänelKlinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany.
Nicola GiesenRobert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ahmet ElmaagacliAsklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas BurchertUniv.-Klinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany.
Thomas WeberUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.
Dimitrios MougiakakosUniversitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan KnopKlinikum Nürnberg Nord, Nürnberg, Germany.
Fabian MüllerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Nicolaus Kröger *Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Maximilian Merz *Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Merzm@mskcc.org.
German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCiltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Following the CARTITUDE-1 results in heavily pretreated patients, the randomized phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for cilta-cel compared with standard of care in lenalidomide-refractory patients after one to three prior lines, leading to label expansion in 2024. However, real-world data characterizing outcomes in this earlier-line indication are lacking.

methodsWe analyzed all patients with RRMM receiving standard-of-care cilta-cel between 2022 and 2025 from the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Patients were stratified by prior lines of therapy into an Early group (1-3 prior lines) and a Late group (> 3 prior lines). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, response conversion, and safety outcomes including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), non-ICANS neurotoxicity, and non-relapse mortality. Prognostic associations were assessed using restricted cubic spline Cox regression and univariable Cox models.

resultsOf 606 patients, 177 (30%) were treated in the Early and 429 (70%) in the Late setting. The overall response rate was 91% and 88%, with complete response in 63% and 54%, respectively. The 12-month PFS was 79% for Early and 70% for Late cilta-cel. Depth of response was the strongest predictor of PFS in both cohorts, with patients maintaining complete response showing 100% PFS at 12 months irrespective of treatment line. Extramedullary disease was adversely prognostic in both groups, whereas high-risk cytogenetics were not associated with inferior PFS in the Early group. Non-ICANS neurotoxicity occurred less frequently in the Early group (3% versus 8%), while non-relapse mortality was comparable (6% versus 7%).

conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates that cilta-cel in earlier lines of therapy achieves deep responses and high PFS consistent with the CARTITUDE-4 trial. These results provide real-world evidence for the deployment of cilta-cel as early as first relapse and may be a benchmark outside prospective trials.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRecurrenceRegistriesStandard of CareReceptors, Chimeric AntigenChimeric antigen receptor T cellsCiltacabtagene autoleucelMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID42163304
PMCPMC13307700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.