Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163293›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026

Evaluating the healthcare access of Syrians in Turkey: a mixed-method analysis.

Simon Ruhnke, Laura Hertner, Sibel Karadağ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon RuhnkeGerman Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval), Fritz-Schäffer-Str. 26, 53113, Bonn, Germany. simon.ruhnke@deval.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5110-7068
Laura HertnerBerlin Institute for Empirical Integration and Migration Research (BIM), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2323-8719
Sibel KaradağKadir Has University, Cibali Mah. Kadir Has Cad, İstanbul, 34083, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-5675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTurkey hosts one of the world's largest refugee populations, making refugee healthcare access a significant public health challenge and a contested policy issue. While Turkey provides free healthcare services to Syrians under Temporary Protection Status (TPS), scholarly debate continues regarding whether health equity has been achieved. Some studies suggest potential overutilization of services, while others identify persistent barriers to equitable access, particularly for Syrians without formal protection status.

methodsThis mixed-methods study employed a sequential design combining quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative component analyzed household survey data from 2,497 face-to-face interviews (1,258 Syrian and 1,239 Turkish respondents) across 20 Turkish provinces in 2022. Healthcare utilization was measured through doctor visits and emergency department visits in the previous 12 months. The qualitative component included 20 semi-structured interviews with Syrians in Istanbul and Gaziantep conducted in 2023-2024, capturing diverse registration statuses and ethnic backgrounds. The analysis was guided by the Behavioral Model of Health Service Use, examining predisposing, enabling, and need factors affecting access to healthcare.

resultsThe quantitative analysis revealed no significant difference in predicted doctor visits between Syrian (79.8%) and Turkish (80.8%) respondents. However, Syrians showed significantly lower probability of emergency department utilization (25.4% vs. 31.75%). Among Syrians, income was a significant predictor of emergency care use, while Turkish proficiency and longer duration of stay were associated with increased healthcare utilization. Qualitative findings revealed stark disparities based on registration status: registered Syrians in their province of registration reported satisfaction with healthcare access, while those facing registration obstacles experienced severe barriers. Those with registration obstacles relied on expensive private care or informal Syrian clinics, creating distinct healthcare access hierarchies determined by legal status and economic resources.

conclusionWhile Turkey's policy framework appears successful for registered Syrians residing in their provinces of registration, significant inequities persist. The restrictive TPS registration system creates a vulnerable subpopulation largely excluded from equitable healthcare access, particularly hospital care. Recent intensification of migration enforcement has exacerbated these disparities, indicating how migration policies directly undermine health equity. Rather than overutilization, the study found underutilization of emergency services by Syrians, contradicting popular narratives about refugee healthcare burden.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRefugeesAccess to Primary CareAdultEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Eastern PeoplePatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesSyriaTurkeyDiscriminationForced displacementHealthcare accessHealthcare useHealth equityLegal protectionMigration policyMigration statusMixed methodSyrian refugeesTurkey

Identifiers

PMID42163293
PMCPMC13214083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.