ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Beyond en-bloc turning: dynamics of head-pelvis coordination in 360° turns in people with Parkinson's.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Freezing of Gait (FOG) reportedly turn using an 'en-bloc' strategy, where the head and pelvis rotate together, unlike the head-leading movement seen in healthy adults. However, previous research relies on discrete maximum separation angles in 180° walking turns, despite recommendations to use 360° on-the-spot turns to better induce FOG. Moreover, existing studies do not capture the time-varying coordination of body segments throughout the turn. Our study aimed to investigate head-pelvis during 360° on-the-spot turns in people with PD and FOG (PD + FOG), PD without FOG (PD-FOG), and healthy controls (HC). Fifteen PD + FOG, fourteen PD - FOG (tested ON medication), and seventeen healthy controls (HC) completed repeated 360° turns while kinematic data were collected using marker-based motion capture. Head and pelvis angles were calculated across strides in the first, middle, and final sections of the turn. Coordination was quantified using vector coding, alongside discrete measures of angular difference and turning performance. Head-pelvis angular difference did not differ between groups. However, PD + FOG showed increased coordination variability compared to HC (4.9°, p = 0.005) and PD - FOG (3.5°, p = 0.047); an observation no longer significant after adjusting for Motor Section (III) of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor scores (p = 0.249) and Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBEST) score (p = 0.051). PD + FOG also took more steps than PD - FOG (34.0, p = 0.008) and HC (6.5, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for covariates (MDS-UPDRS: p = 0.037; MiniBEST: p = 0.003). These findings suggest that people with PD do not necessarily turn more en-bloc than healthy controls. While head-pelvis coordination variability is higher in PD + FOG, this does not seem to be linked to FOG pathology per se, but rather balance deficits associated with disease severity. The impact of balance training on coordination variability and turn performance should be evaluated. Increased step count seems to be related to FOG, which could be a factor that might provoke FOG, but may serve as a compensatory strategy to promote postural stability. Future work should investigate how stride length/frequency modulation during turning affects postural stability and FOG occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.