Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163180›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Suicide risk and REDCap: facilitating clinical trial inclusion.

Benjamin O Brenner, Molly Sullan, Molly E Penzenik, Kelly A Stearns-Yoder, Ryan Holliday, Claire A Hoffmire, Lisa A Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin O BrennerUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Molly SullanVA Brain Health Coordinating Center, Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Molly E PenzenikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kelly A Stearns-YoderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ryan HollidayVA Brain Health Coordinating Center, Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Claire A HoffmireDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lisa A BrennerVA Brain Health Coordinating Center, Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA. lisa.2.brenner@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

Department of Defense W81XWH-16-2-0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering increased rates of suicide, efforts have been focused on facilitating mental health research specifically dedicated to decreasing deaths by intentional self-harm. At the same time, notable suicide risk among those without identified mental health conditions highlight the importance of including such individuals in trials for a wide range of health conditions. To encourage enrollment of those at intermediate/high risk for suicide in both suicide prevention and more general health-related clinical trial research, a feasible and transferable strategy is needed. Such a strategy is outlined within this manuscript.

methodsThe authors used Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), as well as validated measures, to monitor suicide risk among individuals participating in two clinical trials (Facilitating Assessment of At-Risk Sailors using Technology [FAAST]; Implementing Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapies [cCBT] for Suicide Prevention and Depression among At-Risk Rural and Urban Veterans). Individuals whose responses passed a predetermined threshold triggered an automated clinical alert, which resulted in clinical outreach by members of the study team who were licensed mental health providers. Descriptive data (e.g., number of outreaches, outreach attempt at which contact was made, number of individuals never reached) from each of these studies is presented in support of the feasibility of this approach.

resultsDuring the FAAST trial, there were 55 instances in which a participant's response met the clinical threshold for outreach based on responses to survey data (across 279 participants). Nearly all (n = 54 [98.2%]) of these instances resulted in a clinical outreach. In the cCBT trial, there were 200 instances (across 69 participants) in which a participant triggered a clinical alert. Outreach was triggered in 125 (62.5%) of these cases.

conclusionsMethods and findings highlight a feasible strategy for monitoring suicide risk among individuals participating in clinical trials. Use of these methods would be expected to facilitate the inclusion of individuals at intermediate and high suicide risk in a wide range of studies, while also prioritizing safety. Moreover, researchers should be encouraged to identify and disseminate methods, such as those outlined, to facilitate suicide prevention among diverse at-risk cohorts interested in engaging as study participants.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionSuicide PreventionAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSuicideVeteransAt-risk cohortsClinical trialsSuicide risk

Identifiers

PMID42163180
PMCPMC13445734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.