ArticleBMC cancer2026
Impact of chemotherapy dose reduction during concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival outcomes in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDose reduction during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is frequently required in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) because of treatment-related toxicities or poor tolerance. However, the impact of chemotherapy dose reduction on long-term outcomes in LS-SCLC remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether chemotherapy dose reduction compromises survival in patients with LS-SCLC receiving definitive cCRT.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with LS-SCLC treated with definitive cCRT across multiple centers. Patients were categorized into a dose-maintained group and a dose-reduced group according to whether chemotherapy dose reduction occurred during cCRT. To minimize baseline imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied using clinical covariates including age, sex, T stage, N stage, ECOG performance status, smoking status, weight loss, gross tumor volume, and chemotherapy regimens. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models in both unweighted and IPTW-weighted cohorts. Exploratory analyses were additionally performed within the dose-reduced group according to the timing of first dose reduction and the magnitude of dose reduction.
resultsA total of 1,013 patients were included, comprising 627 patients in the dose-maintained group and 386 patients in the dose-reduced group. After IPTW adjustment, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. For OS, the median OS after IPTW adjustment was 57.8 months (95% CI 42.9-70.1) in the dose-maintained group and 42.8 months (95% CI 37.5-67.5) in the dose-reduced group. Chemotherapy dose reduction was not associated with a statistically significant difference in OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.95-1.44, P = 0.132).For PFS, the median PFS after IPTW adjustment was 25.0 months (95% CI 20.7-31.0) in the dose-maintained group and 20.5 months (95% CI 17.1-26.9) in the dose-reduced group. Chemotherapy dose reduction was associated with a modest but statistically significant decrease in PFS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.40, P = 0.047). Within the dose-reduced group, exploratory analyses suggested that patients whose first dose reduction occurred at cycle ≥ 3 had significantly better PFS and OS than those whose first dose reduction occurred during cycles 1-2.Treatment-related adverse events were broadly comparable between groups, with no statistically significant reduction observed in the dose-reduced group.
conclusionsIn this multicenter real-world cohort of patients with LS-SCLC treated with definitive cCRT, chemotherapy dose reduction was not associated with a statistically significant difference in OS after IPTW adjustment but was associated with a modestly shorter PFS. Given the absence of an apparent reduction in treatment-related toxicity, chemotherapy dose reduction should not be considered an ideal strategy when full-dose treatment is feasible, although it may remain a pragmatic option for selected patients with limited treatment tolerance. The exploratory association between early dose reduction and poorer survival should be interpreted cautiously, as it may reflect greater frailty or poorer treatment tolerance rather than a direct causal effect of dose-reduction timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.