ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Identifying the factors influencing long-term care utilization by older adults in China: machine learning analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo address the aging population in China, local governments began to encourage the establishment of formal care services and supplement informal care in 2015, thereby increasing the availability of different types of long-term care (LTC). In this study, nationwide survey data were accessed to identify factors influencing the types of LTC utilization by older adults in China.
methodsData from 2,305 eligible older adults receiving care were retrieved from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey. The independent variables were structured around the predisposing, enabling, and need factors of the Andersen healthcare utilization model, while the dependent variable was categorized by the type of long-term care utilized (informal versus formal care). The analytical pipeline included a 70/30 train-test data split, Bayesian Ridge multiple imputation for missing values, and LASSO logistic regression for feature selection. To correct for severe classification imbalance, cost-sensitive learning via algorithmic class weighting was applied. Eleven machine learning (ML) models were constructed and optimized using fivefold cross-validation within the training set. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretability framework was used on the independent test set to evaluate variable importance, dependencies, and interactions.
resultsDescriptive chi-square test results indicated that age, marital status, social activity, smoking, income state, residence, and living arrangement significantly the type of care received. Following feature selection and evaluation across the 11 ML models, the Random Forest model achieved the highest predictive performance on the independent test set. Subsequent SHAP interpretation of the Random Forest model identified marital status, living arrangement, social activity, physical activity, age, and residence as the most associated variables for formal care utilization. Analysis of specific impacts showed that individuals who lived alone, were over the age of 80, participated in weekly physical activities, or did not participate in social activities were more inclined to use formal care. Overall, marital status, living arrangement, and social activity participation were identified as the key interacting factors associated with the types of long-term care utilized by older adults in China.
conclusionsLiving arrangement, social activity and residence were the most significant factors associated with the types of LTC utilization by older adults in China. Overall, enabling and predisposing factors had a greater influence than the need factors. These findings not only demonstrate the potential value of ML for LTC policy development, but also provide empirical support for the Chinese government to adopt targeted interventions that enhance LTC service accessibility and affordability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.