Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163078›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

mGEM: multigraph estimation models for pattern analysis.

Alfonso Landeros, Dhwani Krishnan, Kenneth Lange, Mary Sehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alfonso LanderosDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA. alandero@ucr.edu.
Dhwani KrishnanDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA.
Kenneth LangeDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA.
Mary SehlDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1554, USA. msehl@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Genomics, GPUs, and Next Generation Computational StatisticsR01HG006139 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOBEL, ERIC · 2011 to 2023
$5.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006139NIH HHS R01-HG006139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany networks contain node and edge data in the form of node-specific covariates and edge weights, respectively. Established methods for investigating graph structure often rely on dichotimizing edge data. This simplification motivates the development of techniques for multivariate analysis. In the context of biological networks, such as in gene co-expression analysis, flexible tools and models are needed to interrogate data for enrichment and differential interactions. We present Multigraph Estimation Models (mGEM) as flexible alternatives to correlation-based methods for analyzing co-occurrence and co-expression data.

methodsThe mGEM approach interprets non-negative integer-valued edge weights as multiple edges in a multigraph and models the expected number of edges between nodes through a propensity-based relation. Overdispersion and node-specific attributes are treated under a unified parametric framework by changing distributional assumptions and reparameterization, respectively. By providing a background model for comparison, we are able to compute residuals that, in turn, are used to rank associations between nodes using mutual ranks and identify dependent components.

conclusionsWe consider several simulated and real data examples including a classic nematode neural network, a manually-added co-authorship network derived from Google Scholar, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-expression data from RNA-seq experiments. These examples illustrate how our models can be used in exploratory data analysis to generate potentially interesting hypotheses. For example, our co-authorship analysis extracts known collaborations between universities and reveals connections between fields of interest. In analyzing co-expression data, mGEM posits several gene modules that share similarities with correlation-based analyses yet exhibit greater diversity in terms of co-expression propensities.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAlgorithmsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksCo-expression networksCo-occurrence analysisCount modelsMultigraphsRegression

Identifiers

PMID42163078
PMCPMC13366912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.