ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
mGEM: multigraph estimation models for pattern analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany networks contain node and edge data in the form of node-specific covariates and edge weights, respectively. Established methods for investigating graph structure often rely on dichotimizing edge data. This simplification motivates the development of techniques for multivariate analysis. In the context of biological networks, such as in gene co-expression analysis, flexible tools and models are needed to interrogate data for enrichment and differential interactions. We present Multigraph Estimation Models (mGEM) as flexible alternatives to correlation-based methods for analyzing co-occurrence and co-expression data.
methodsThe mGEM approach interprets non-negative integer-valued edge weights as multiple edges in a multigraph and models the expected number of edges between nodes through a propensity-based relation. Overdispersion and node-specific attributes are treated under a unified parametric framework by changing distributional assumptions and reparameterization, respectively. By providing a background model for comparison, we are able to compute residuals that, in turn, are used to rank associations between nodes using mutual ranks and identify dependent components.
conclusionsWe consider several simulated and real data examples including a classic nematode neural network, a manually-added co-authorship network derived from Google Scholar, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-expression data from RNA-seq experiments. These examples illustrate how our models can be used in exploratory data analysis to generate potentially interesting hypotheses. For example, our co-authorship analysis extracts known collaborations between universities and reveals connections between fields of interest. In analyzing co-expression data, mGEM posits several gene modules that share similarities with correlation-based analyses yet exhibit greater diversity in terms of co-expression propensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.