Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163063›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Historical case study of a transfer experiment that demonstrated the importance of the estuarine ecosystem for the survival of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) at the Campbell River estuary, British Columbia, Canada.

Colin D Levings, J Steve Macdonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin D LevingsScientist Emeriti, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Science Enterprise Centre, West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-6085
J Steve MacdonaldScientist Emeriti, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Science Enterprise Centre, West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Fisheries and Oceans Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estuary dependence to the survival of Chinook salmon was investigated at the Campbell River estuary, British Columbia, Canada. Replicate batches of marked smolts were transferred from a hatchery and released in 1983, 1984 and 1985 at four ecosystems, two that ensured estuarine experience (river, estuary) and two seawards of the estuary (transition, marine). Juveniles were tracked with beach seine collections, providing residency times in the four ecosystems. Marked adult salmon were enumerated in the fishery and spawning grounds for 6 years. Recoveries from the marine and transition ecosystem releases comprised 35.1% of the total recoveries (smolt-to-adult survival 0.34%), whereas 64.9% were from river and estuary ecosystems (smolt-to-adult survival 0.60%). Fish released in the marine ecosystem in 1985 were recovered at higher rates than in 1983 or 1984, creating a statistical interaction between year and release location that implicated differences in annual ocean conditions. Results are related to present-day salmon conservation challenges and restoration consequences. In essence, transfer experiments complement other approaches to studies of salmon estuary dependence but require considerable field labour efforts and attention to temporal replication to achieve statistical rigour. Experimental interpretation can be improved with investigations expanded to include several populations and estuaries and a more extensive consideration of annual variability in river and ocean conditions.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEstuariesSalmonAnimalsBritish ColumbiaRiversChinook salmonecosystemestuarysmolt‐to‐adult survivaltransfer experiment

Identifiers

PMID42163063
PMCPMC13521722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.