ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Structural Inequalities in Online Health Information Seeking: Cross-National Multilevel Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural Inequalities in Online Health Information Seeking: Cross-National Multilevel Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Online health information-seeking behavior (OHISB) has become an increasingly common component of contemporary health self-management. Individuals use a wide range of digital sources, including websites, social media platforms, and mobile apps, to obtain health-related information. However, substantial disparities persist in who seeks health information online, and which populations benefit from digital health resources. While previous research has largely focused on individual-level determinants, cross-national evidence on structural influences remains limited. Objective: This study aims to assess between-country variation in OHISB, examine associations between individual-level characteristics and OHISB, and investigate how country-level structural conditions are associated with cross-national differences in OHISB, net of individual-level characteristics. Methods: Data were drawn from the Health and Health Care II module of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP 2021-2024; n=35,592; 32 countries). OHISB was measured as any use of the Internet to search for health-related information during the past 12 months. Multilevel logistic regression models were estimated. Country-level indicators were reduced using principal component analysis into 4 composite indices. Robustness checks included analyses excluding respondents without internet access and models incorporating survey weights. Results: OHISB varied substantially across countries (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.177). At the individual level, younger age, higher education, female respondents, recent health problems, doctor visits, unmet medical needs, and perceived usefulness of the internet were associated with higher odds of OHISB. At the macro level, the socioeconomic and health development showed the strongest association (odds ratio=1.52 per SD; P=.003) and explained a substantial share of between-country variation. Cultural hierarchy-individualism was associated with OHISB in separate models but attenuated when adjusted for development. Cross-level interactions indicated that the gender gap and the role of perceived usefulness were more pronounced in higher-development contexts, although these findings were exploratory. Conclusions: OHISB is associated with both individual characteristics and broader structural conditions. Socioeconomic and health development appear to play a key contextual role in shaping cross-national differences in digital health engagement, highlighting the importance of addressing both individual and structural dimensions of digital health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.