Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162970›Full record

Observational studyClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

A New CA19-9 Cutoff Value Identifies Lewis Antigen Status and Refines Prognostic Stratification in PDAC.

Chia-Ming Yeh, Chih-Chuan Yu, An-Fu Lee, Siao Muk Cheng, Che-Wei Hsu, Nai-Jung Chiang, Ya-Chin Hou, Hui-Jen Tsai, Shang-Hung Chen, Chia-Jui Yen and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chia-Ming Yeh *National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-0538
Chih-Chuan Yu *National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-5498
An-Fu Lee *Deparment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-6070
Siao Muk ChengNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8145-4220
Che-Wei HsuDeparment of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-9835
Nai-Jung ChiangDepartment of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9292-0055
Ya-Chin HouInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-9568
Hui-Jen TsaiNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-5748
Shang-Hung ChenNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-4757
Chia-Jui YenDeparment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8744-6248
Chih-Jung WangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7625-2891
Ying-Jui ChaoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2345-4702
Shih-Chang ChuangDivision of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1481-1632
Jeng-Shiun DuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-4979
Daw-Yang Hwang *National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5139-3612
Yan-Shen Shan *Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-5189
Li-Tzong Chen *National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3250-7167
Yung-Yeh SuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-5316

Funding

Kaohsiung Medical University (KMU) KMU-TC113A04National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine/National Health Research Institutes Joint Research Program NHRI-NCKUMC-11305National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) CA-113-PP-07National Science and Technology Council/T-Star Center NSTC 113-2634-F-039-001the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 111-2314-B-400-027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCarbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) has limited utility in the ∼10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who are Lewis-negative CA19-9 "nonproducers" (FUT3-null). This study aims to define the prognosis of FUT3-null PDAC and establish a CA19-9 cutoff that can help identify this subgroup in clinical practice. EXPERIMENTAL

designGermline whole-exome sequencing was performed in a multicenter cohort of 615 patients with PDAC to determine FUT2/FUT3 genotypes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified the optimal CA19-9 cutoff for FUT3-null status. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to derive CA19-9 cutoffs that best stratified overall survival (OS) in a training set (n = 307) and were tested in a validation set (n = 308).

resultsFUT3-null patients had similar demographics except for a lower median baseline CA19-9 level (2.4 vs. 496 U/mL in FUT3-intact patients) and a comparable median OS (13.5 months) to FUT3-intact patients with CA19-9 >200 U/mL (12.9 months). ROC analysis identified 7 U/mL as the optimal CA19-9 cutoff for FUT3-null (positive predictive value 95.1%; accuracy 87.9%). Using CA19-9 cutoffs of 7 and 200 U/mL (without genotyping), patients were stratified into four prognostic groups: >7 to 37 U/mL (median OS, 23.2 months), >37 to 200 U/mL (median OS, 22 months), >200 U/mL (median OS, 12.8 months), and ≤7 U/mL (likely FUT3-null; median OS, 13.5 months; P < 0.001). Findings were consistent in multivariable Cox models.

conclusionsCA19-9 nonproducers whose outcomes are comparable with those with CA19-9 >200 U/mL represent a high-risk subgroup. CA19-9 ≤7 U/mL is a practical surrogate for identifying these patients. When genotyping is unavailable, a dual-threshold model (≤7 and >200 U/mL) improves risk stratification.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalLewis Blood Group AntigensPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedExome SequencingFemaleFucosyltransferasesGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC Curve3-galactosyl-N-acetylglucosaminide 4-alpha-L-fucosyltransferaseBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenFucosyltransferasesLewis Blood Group Antigens

Identifiers

PMID42162970
PMCPMC13320200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.