Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Meat Intake and Risk of Gastric and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study.

Catalina Bonet, Lucía Rizzolo-Brime, Sara Montañés, Mariem Hajji, Chloé Marques, Gianluca Severi, Matthias B Schulze, Christina C Dahm, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Catalina BonetUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-2591
Lucía Rizzolo-BrimeUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Sara MontañésUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Mariem HajjiParis-Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Villejuif, France.
Chloé MarquesParis-Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Villejuif, France.
Gianluca SeveriParis-Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Villejuif, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7157-419X
Matthias B SchulzeGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Christina C DahmDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne TjønnelandDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anja OlsenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria S De MagistrisA.O.U. Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valeria PalaFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-970X
Alberto CatalanoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-2060
Guri SkeieDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø (UiT)-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Magritt BrustadDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø (UiT)-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Torill Enget JensenDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø (UiT)-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Maria-José SánchezEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain.
Marcela GuevaraCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Natalia Cabrera CastroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Keren PapierCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-6835
Elisabete WeiderpassInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Viktoria KnazeEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Jin Young ParkEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Gwen MurphyCancer Screening and Prevention Research Group (CSPRG), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-5337
Antonio AgudoUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Paula JakszynUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Funding

International Agency of Research and CancerSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether meat consumption increases the risk of gastric cancer (GC) and esophageal cancer or not remains unclear. Moreover, the number of prospective studies evaluating the associations by anatomical and histological types of GC is limited. We aimed to assess the associations of red, processed, and white meat with all gastric adenocarcinomas by anatomical site and histological type, and with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study of 450,112 individuals (131,426 men/318,686 women). Over 14.1 years of follow-up, 876 GC and 215 EAC cases were identified. Among the GC cases, 233 were located in cardia and 329 in non-cardia regions. Histologically, 624 were classified as intestinal type and 208 as diffuse type. The associations between meat intake and risk of GC or EAC were assessed using multivariable Cox models. A 30 g/day increase in processed meat consumption was associated with a 9% (95% CI: 2-17) increase in GC risk and a 13% (95% CI: 0-27) increase in EAC risk. Additionally, a 20 g/day increase in white meat intake was associated with a 12% (95% CI: 2-24) increase in non-cardia GC risk. Processed meat was also associated with intestinal GC (11%, 95% CI: 2-20) and higher consumption with diffuse GC. Only processed meat was associated with GC among men while processed and white meat were both positively associated with GC among women. In conclusion, processed meat may increase the risk of GC and EAC, although further research is needed to clarify the effects of white meat consumption.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDietEsophageal NeoplasmsMeatStomach NeoplasmsAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factorscohort studyesophageal adenocarcinomagastric cancerred and processed meatwhite meat

Identifiers

PMID42162965
PMCPMC13340963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.