Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162941›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2026

Occupational Licensing and Psychologist Supply.

Daniel Goetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel GoetzUniversity of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-900X

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does reducing interstate licensing barriers increase the supply of mental health providers? We study this question using the U.S. Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), which allows psychologists to practice across state lines via telemedicine without obtaining additional state licenses. Because interstate telemedicine entry is difficult to track using physical practice locations, we utilize data from a large mental health provider search platform, where providers choose which zipcodes they are listed in as search results. Leveraging states' staggered accession timings for identification, we find a nuanced supply response: although joining PSYPACT increases listings in a state by 7.7% within a year, the response is entirely driven by incumbent psychologists within a state listing for the first time. We find evidence consistent with incumbents responding to a perceived threat of entry, as states with ex ante high licensing costs exhibit the largest treatment effects, and incumbents choose to list in underserved, high-income areas within those states.

Indexed as

LicensureMental Health ServicesPsychologistsHumansTelemedicineUnited Statesaccess inequalitydigital platformsmarket entrymental health careoccupational licensingPSYPACTtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42162941
PMCPMC13428624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.