ArticleOphthalmology2026
Prevalence of Strabismus and Decreased Stereopsis in Parents of Children with Strabismus.
Article in Ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStrabismus affects 1% to 4% of children and shows strong familial predilections, although exact genetic mechanisms are not fully understood. Previous studies have noted abnormal binocularity in parents of children with strabismus. This study investigates the prevalence of strabismus and subnormal stereopsis in parents of children with various types of strabismus, including infantile, accommodative, nonaccommodative esotropia, and exotropia.
designProspective cohort study involving families enrolled in a genetics study at Boston Children's Hospital; retrospective review of a cohort of children without visual complaints presenting for screening eye examination.
participantsA total of 2164 parents of children with strabismus were enrolled; 481 (303 mothers and 178 fathers) underwent orthoptic examination. There were 208 control children aged ≥8 years with no visual complaints or history of strabismus.
methodsOrthoptic examinations or self-reported survey data for diagnosis.
main outcome measuresAbnormal sensorimotor examinations among parents (strabismus, phoria, or decreased stereopsis), prevalence of strabismus and associated conditions on self-report, and alignment type correlation between parents and children. Additionally, stereopsis was evaluated in control children for a comparative baseline.
resultsParents of children with strabismus had high rates of abnormal sensorimotor examinations; 50.2% of mothers and 60.1% of fathers demonstrated abnormalities. Specifically, 22.4% of mothers and 28.1% of fathers were diagnosed with strabismus, and 27.7% of mothers and 32.0% of fathers had conditions associated with strabismus (subnormal stereopsis, phorias 10 prism diopters (PD) or more, or a history of patching and exercises). There were no significant differences in rates of abnormal parental examination results based on strabismus type of the child. Most parents shared the same deviation type with their children, signifying familial phenotypic inheritance. Stereopsis was subnormal in 14.9% of controls.
conclusionsThis study highlights the familial nature of strabismus and high rate of abnormal stereopsis in parents of children with strabismus. This suggests that low stereopsis may be a subclinical form of strabismus. A notable discrepancy in self-reported and examined diagnoses underscores the need for clinical evaluations. Our findings suggest that low stereopsis could be used as a phenotype in large biobank genetic studies to allow greater understanding of strabismus, which is often neglected in eye genetic studies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.