ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
Reassessing and Updating Regulatory Standards on the Declaration of Storage Conditions in the Product Information of Medicinal Products: An Evidence-Based Proposal under EMA Guidance.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline Declaration of Storage Conditions in the Product Information of Medicinal Products (CPMP/QWP/609/96/Rev.2) was last revised in 2007. Since then, advances in stability science, increased climatic variability, and evolving regulatory expectations have highlighted limitations in the framework, particularly the use of vague descriptors such as "room temperature" or "no special storage conditions." This work reassesses the scientific and regulatory basis for storage statements, integrating current understanding of mean kinetic temperature (MKT), climate-related risks, and developments in ICH and WHO guidance, and proposes a harmonized revision (Rev.3).
methodsA structured analysis of regulatory and scientific principles was conducted, incorporating MKT, climate-related risks, and developments in ICH and WHO guidance. These elements informed a revised framework and model storage statements, including a decision table linking stability outcomes to label statements.
resultsThe proposed update introduces explicit temperature-based statements, strengthens the linkage between stability data and label wording, clarifies requirements for moisture- and light-sensitive products, expands guidance for sterile and reconstituted preparations, and provides contingency instructions for temperature excursions. A decision table mapping stability outcomes to label statements is included to support regulatory implementation.
conclusionThis revision provides an updated synthesis of EMA, ICH, and WHO requirements, translating regulatory principles into clear storage statements and contingency guidance. It offers a more precise framework reducing ambiguity, supports justification of storage conditions through stability data and MKT-informed risk assessment, aiming to improve understanding among patients and healthcare professionals, strengthening real-world product quality and contributing to future EMA guideline development. HIGHLIGHTS: Identifies scientific and regulatory limitations in current "no special storage conditions" terminology; Links ICH stability guidelines and climatic variability to precise storage statements; Proposes harmonised core label phrases for room temperature, fridge, and freezer; Introduces contingency labelling for climate-related and cold-chain excursions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.