ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Demographic Differences in Long COVID Diagnosis Across Levels of Care: Implications for Clinical Practice.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong COVID is a novel condition primarily studied in outpatient settings, failing to capture the full spectrum of affected patients, particularly those from disadvantaged populations. Demographic differences in the medical encounter setting of initial long COVID diagnosis suggest disparities in symptom severity, care access, and utilization.
objectiveTo identify demographic factors associated with the encounter setting at initial long COVID diagnosis.
designRetrospective study utilizing data from the electronic medical record within the largest Midwestern non-profit healthcare system. PATIENTS: In total, 8008 patients aged 18+ with initial long COVID diagnosis (ICD-10 U09.9) between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2023. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, median household income) and encounter setting at first long COVID diagnosis were extracted. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds of encounter setting at first diagnosis by demographic subgroup. KEY
resultsPatients were most frequently diagnosed with long COVID in an outpatient non-diagnostic encounter (92%), followed by emergency (3%), outpatient diagnostic (e.g., following laboratory or imaging; 3%), and inpatient (2%). After mutually adjusting for all demographic factors, relative to first long COVID diagnosis in the outpatient non-diagnostic setting, older age was associated with higher odds of first diagnosis in outpatient diagnostic and inpatient settings but lower odds in the emergency setting. Greater median household income was associated with higher odds of first diagnosis in the outpatient diagnostic setting but lower odds in the emergency setting. Patients with Medicaid had lower odds of first diagnosis in the outpatient diagnostic setting but 3.0 times higher odds in emergency settings.
conclusionsPatients with lower socioeconomic status indicators had increased odds of first long COVID diagnosis in higher acuity settings, suggesting potential differences in symptom severity, access, and care-seeking behaviors. Long COVID research and education should target patients and providers in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42162520What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.