ArticleSpine deformity2026
Sagittal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity seems to increase frontal instability during gait.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate instability during gait and their determinants in ASD patients.
methods123 ASD patients and 42 controls underwent biplanar radiographs with calculation of spinopelvic and global alignment parameters, and performed 3D gait analysis to calculate full-body kinematics. They all filled the SF-36 with its physical component (PCS). The frontal and sagittal Center of Mass-Center of Pressure (CoM-CoP) angles were calculated during the gait cycle. Patients were classified as ASD-unstable or ASD-stable based on the corridor of normality of the CoM-CoP angle. Kinematics, radiographic parameters and PCS were compared between groups.
resultsAll ASD patients had a normal CoM-CoP angle in the sagittal plane. 38 ASD were classified as unstable in the frontal plane and 85 as stable (14 ± 3° vs 8 ± 2° resp., p < 0.001). While the 2 groups had a similar pelvic incidence (PI = 53°), ASD-unstable patients had an increased SVA (69 vs 20 mm), and global tilt (GT: 33 vs 24°, all p < 0.05), compared to ASD-stable. The frontal Cobb was similar between the 2 groups (Cobb = 17°). ASD-unstable also had an increased sagittal kinematic ODHA (10 vs 6°), and a decreased normalized step length (0.30 vs 0.34, both p < 0.05). They also had a decreased PCS (33 vs 37).
conclusionASD patients with increased global sagittal malalignment (SVA & GT) appear to have increased frontal instability during gait. Frontal instability during gait was associated with kinematic limitations in the sagittal plane and deterioration in quality of life. Future work will focus on changes in gait stability in ASD patients after corrective spinal malalignment surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42162509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.