ArticleEMBO molecular medicine2026
Long-term restoration of auditory function in a DFNA2 mouse model by adenine base editing.
Article in EMBO molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary hearing loss, the most prevalent genetic sensory disorder, lacks approved pharmacological therapies and represents a compelling target for gene correction. Pathogenic variants in KCNQ4 account for ~9.5% of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic cases. Prior gene-editing strategies disrupting mutant alleles have failed to achieve durable auditory rescue. Here we employed a knock-in mouse model harboring the human KCNQ4 c.961 G > A (p.G321S) mutation to evaluate precise base editing. Dual-AAV delivery of the adenine base editor ABE8e achieved 21.4-28.9% correction in the organ of Corti-the highest efficiency reported for genetic hearing loss. A dose-dependent therapeutic window emerged: higher doses promoted rapid recovery, whereas optimized lower doses minimized long-term toxicity and sustained functional benefit for at least 32 weeks. Treatment reduced auditory brainstem response thresholds by up to 49.09 dB SPL at optimal frequencies, mitigated degeneration of hair cells, spiral ganglion neurons, and auditory nerve fibers, and partially restored outer hair cell electrophysiology. These findings demonstrate the durability of precise mutation correction over allele-disruptive approaches and support clinical translation for KCNQ4-associated hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.