ArticleNature2026
Feature-specific threat coding in lateral septum guides defensive action.
Article in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Neurotensin Brake on Exploratory Drive under Persistent Threat.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to rapidly detect and evaluate potential threats is essential for survival and requires the integration of sensory information with internal state and previous experience. The lateral septum (LS)-an inhibitory structure in the limbic forebrain-is thought to integrate these higher-order cognitive signals to regulate defensive responses
Indexed as
Identifiers
42162422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.