Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162416›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026

Revisiting the life cycle of temperate phages.

Jakob T Rostøl, Cora Chmielowska, Alberto Marina, José R Penadés

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob T Rostøl *Centre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.rostoel@imperial.ac.uk.
Cora Chmielowska *Centre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alberto MarinaInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IBV-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
José R PenadésCentre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.penades@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-5262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperate bacteriophages (phages) are ubiquitous viruses that co-evolve with their bacterial hosts. They are defined by their ability to undergo two distinct life cycles: the lytic cycle, in which the phage produces more viral copies and kills the host, and the lysogenic cycle, in which the temperate phage exists as a prophage in the host. Temperate phages have long served as fundamental models in microbiology, genetics and evolutionary biology research, and their life cycles are among the most thoroughly characterized in virology. Historically, the phage life cycle was viewed primarily through the lens of how excision, replication and packaging drive the formation of infective particles. Although it captures the central processes of the phage life cycle, this narrow perspective overlooks the full range of interactions with the host and with other mobile genetic elements. In this Review, we re-examine the temperate phage life cycle in light of emerging insights that expand on this framework with unanticipated complexities. We argue that many properties of (pro)phages should be viewed as integral parts of their life cycle instead of being discussed separately. This holistic view is important to fully appreciate the intricacies of the temperate phage life cycle and the key roles of these viruses in microbiology and biotechnological applications.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesLysogenyProphagesVirus Replication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.