ArticleNature genetics2026
Non-Mendelian inheritance of DNA methylation patterns in mice.
Article in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic remodeling during UV exposure: high resolution analysis of histone post-translational modifications in a DNA binding protein 2 mutant model.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- Fiber-TEnCATS reveals haplotype-specific chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation at human L1HS loci.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The promise of adaptive health in the United Arab Emirates and beyond.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Non-Mendelian inheritance of DNA methylation patterns in mice.Nature genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic mechanisms such as genomic imprinting demonstrate that molecular inheritance can deviate from typical Mendelian patterns. Despite this, the intergenerational inheritance of DNA methylation remains poorly understood. Here we developed a genome-wide approach to study epigenetic inheritance in mice using long-read nanopore sequencing. Using this approach in both liver and muscle, we found that ~93% of autosomal epigenetic inheritance patterns followed Mendel's laws, primarily driven by cis-acting methylation quantitative trait loci. However, we also identified extensive non-Mendelian inheritance, including emergent epigenetic inheritance patterns, widespread sex-specific DNA methylation patterns localized to the liver, and five seemingly new autosomal and X-linked imprinted genes. Notably, we also report an example of naturally occurring intergenerational paramutation, confirmed over strain-specific transposable elements within Capn11 and highly likely at Vps37c. Overall, an unexpectedly high ~7% of autosomal epigenetic inheritance patterns identified were non-Mendelian, highlighting the importance of epigenetic information in the analysis of inherited traits and disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.