Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162403›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2026

Predictors of the need for escalation therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with an Impella device: a novel approach using electrocardiography.

Yuhi Fujimoto, Jun Nakata, Hideki Miyachi, Junya Matsuda, Reiko Shiomura, Shuhei Tara, Yu-Ki Iwasaki, Takeshi Yamamoto, Kuniya Asai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuhi FujimotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan. y-fujimoto6081@nms.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-7325
Jun NakataDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki MiyachiDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junya MatsudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Reiko ShiomuraDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuhei TaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Yu-Ki IwasakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Takeshi YamamotoDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniya AsaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock has a high mortality rate. Even with the use of the Impella device, there are certain number of cases require further escalation therapy, although the predictive factors have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to estimate the acute mortality rate and the rate of requiring escalation therapy, as well as evaluate the predictors of the need for escalation therapy, including electrocardiographic parameters. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the patients with cardiogenic shock on Impella support between April 2018 and June 2021. Electrocardiogram, serum lactate levels, and pulmonary artery catheterization parameters were assessed 12 h after Impella implantation. Patients who died or required escalation therapy within 30 days of Impella implantation were defined as the deteriorated group and the remaining as the recovered group. A total of 67 patients with cardiogenic shock (66 ± 16 years; 46 men) with Impella were evaluated. The 30-day mortality rate and rate of requiring escalation therapy were 24% and 18%, respectively. The P terminal force in lead V1 (PTF) was significantly higher in the deteriorated group than in the recovered group (0.052 ± 0.032 vs. 0.022 ± 0.010 mm·s, respectively; p < 0.001). On receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, PTF ≥ 0.035 mm·s identified the deteriorated group with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 96% (area under the curve = 0.93, p < 0.001). PTF might be a new simple noninvasive predictor of the need for escalation therapy in patients with an implanted Impella.

Indexed as

Cardiogenic shockECGImpellaP terminal forceP wave

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.