ArticleHeart and vessels2026
Predictors of the need for escalation therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with an Impella device: a novel approach using electrocardiography.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock has a high mortality rate. Even with the use of the Impella device, there are certain number of cases require further escalation therapy, although the predictive factors have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to estimate the acute mortality rate and the rate of requiring escalation therapy, as well as evaluate the predictors of the need for escalation therapy, including electrocardiographic parameters. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the patients with cardiogenic shock on Impella support between April 2018 and June 2021. Electrocardiogram, serum lactate levels, and pulmonary artery catheterization parameters were assessed 12 h after Impella implantation. Patients who died or required escalation therapy within 30 days of Impella implantation were defined as the deteriorated group and the remaining as the recovered group. A total of 67 patients with cardiogenic shock (66 ± 16 years; 46 men) with Impella were evaluated. The 30-day mortality rate and rate of requiring escalation therapy were 24% and 18%, respectively. The P terminal force in lead V1 (PTF) was significantly higher in the deteriorated group than in the recovered group (0.052 ± 0.032 vs. 0.022 ± 0.010 mm·s, respectively; p < 0.001). On receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, PTF ≥ 0.035 mm·s identified the deteriorated group with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 96% (area under the curve = 0.93, p < 0.001). PTF might be a new simple noninvasive predictor of the need for escalation therapy in patients with an implanted Impella.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42162403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.