Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42162322›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026

Translating functional molecular knowledge into crop-breeding success.

Guillaume P Ramstein, Jingjing Zhai, Edward S Buckler, Maud I Tenaillon, Jean-Luc Jannink

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guillaume P RamsteinCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. ramstein@qgg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-1113
Jingjing ZhaiInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-3103
Edward S BucklerInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-371X
Maud I TenaillonGénétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Jean-Luc JanninkSection of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical plant breeding, which optimizes phenotypes through selective crossing guided by phenotypic evaluation and molecular markers, is limited by evolutionary constraints that hinder rapid crop improvement. A new paradigm, precision breeding, circumvents these limitations by targeting genetic variants through functional molecular knowledge. To generate this knowledge at scale, sequence-based deep learning leverages high-quality genome sequence data to predict variant effects at base-pair resolution. When linked to agronomically important traits, these predictions enable breeders to prioritize variants for precision selection or editing. Although it is still in the early stages of development, we foresee three key applications for this approach: introgressing genes from distant breeding pools, purging deleterious mutations and designing new plant ideotypes. Looking ahead, refined computational models will facilitate targeted editing and the systematic redesign of complex physiological processes to address emerging breeding goals under shifting environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantPlant BreedingGenetic VariationPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID42162322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.