ArticleScientific reports2026
Visual design and digital transformation of imaging under artificial intelligence technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a conditional hierarchical generative adversarial network (GAN) model for intelligent visual design, aiming to explore new modes of human-machine collaboration and promote digital transformation in the design field. The proposed model consists of three core modules: a multimodal conditional fusion encoder, a hierarchical generator, and a collaborative multi-discriminator architecture. It innovatively integrates multiple sources of design intent-including textual descriptions, hand-drawn sketches, spatial layouts, and brand guidelines-through a cross-modal attention mechanism. The model adopts a two-stage generation strategy of "structure first, details later" and introduces multi-objective adversarial training to simultaneously optimize generation quality, layout accuracy, and semantic consistency. Experiments on the Common Objects in Context with Stuff Annotations (COCO-Stuff) 164 K dataset show that the model achieves a Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) score of 18.37 and 92.8% layout control accuracy on the test set. These results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly outperforms mainstream baseline models in both generation quality and controllability. This study provides an innovative technical solution for professional visual design and offers theoretical and practical insights into the evolution of creative agency, human-machine collaboration mechanisms, and the pathways of digital transformation in the Artificial Intelligence era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.